Jul 23 2008
Why Not Lease Your Telephones?
In 1992 when I left high-school and needed a Job, I found that AT&T was hiring. They were hiring for their leased phone division. Since the breakup of MaBell in 1984, AT&T maintained the leased telephone division.
The primary aspect of my
job was to convince people that leasing telephones was a viable thing to do. (dumb, huh?) And I was very successful. I would lease cordless phones at $50 per month… and you could go and buy one at the time for $100.
I would very often get calls like, "I just noticed that I had a bill from you all for $4.95 for a Princess Phone. I don’t have this phone, please cancel my bill"
Upon further discussion with the client, we had been billing them since 1984 for that phone at $4.95 per month because prices never changed. (Our records didn’t go before the break-up) Nearly $500 over the 8 years. They often would not have seen the phone in 5 or 6 or more years… yet we were still billing them and they kept making the payment.
How does this apply today?
Well, at my phone book post, there has been a discussion about the thought that if a client buys an ad, he must think that it is worth something… it must provide him some value.
Nope. I don’t buy that sales line for a minute.
Sure, some people may actually see benefit. Some people may actually see an increase in sales, but, just because a salesman can continue to sell someone on something doesn’t mean it is worth the paper it is printed on.
Let’s not confuse the ability to sell something with the actual viability of the value of that product.
Corey Smith is the Chief Web Architect for Dealer Marketing Systems and is the editor in chief for OfficeProductNews.net.




I heard on the radio today that more and more businesses are putting into place no gun policies. As if telling someone, that wants to bring a gun, that it is wrong will magically stop that person from bringing a gun. It is the same with any law that we have. Making a law requiring seatbelts, speed limits, shoplifting, larceny, theft, drugs, etc does not, nor ever will prevent a "thing" from happening.
14 years ago, I bought my first new car. I worked for a radio station at the time and the top sales rep’s husband was the General Manager for a car dealership. I worked out the pricing before I ever showed up. I paid $1 over invoice. I thought I got a great deal (until after I purchased, I found that was the deal for everyone and that I can usually get below invoice if I am patient… but I digress).
I don’t know if you have heard this or said it before. But I have heard a number of people over the last few years use this idiom. 
